The use of advanced RC aircraft has revolutionized the inspection, survey, photography, and many other industries, with consumers benefiting from reduced prices and increased safety. Like it or not, drones are here to stay, and breaking news, the world is not flat either. The term "drone" is an overblown term given to our new professional class of flying plastic and silicone cameras to add a little drama to the story, which are officially termed small unmanned aerial systems (UAS). However, valid safety and privacy concerns have emerged due to these new capabilities, volume of sales, and lack of public knowledge over their safe/appropriate use. The focus of this blog is to assist in the safe use of small UAS into our airspace, dispel a few myths, and raise public awareness.
Check out this story By Kelly Baumgarten | Posted: Tue 10:27 PM, Jul 12, 2016
Many concerns have been raised by the anti drone proponents, such as terrorism, voyeurism, and even property rights, but with little perspective on the facts. For instance, RC aircraft hobbyists have been flying large fixed wing aircraft since the 70's that could drop a much more serious bomb payload than 99.9% of the current high tech drones, and it is already a felony in the state of Florida for anyone to record you, in any way, where you have a reasonable expectation of privacy. That being said, it is no less legal for a drone operator to take pictures of the public beach that you are sitting on than any person with a ground based camera. However, a line is drawn when a drone operator risks public safety or violates the privacy rights of others.
The FAA has established reasonable laws governing both hobbyists and commercial pilots alike, and I strongly recommend that everyone embraces this first set of rules (almost no difference from the 1970's rules) so that we can leverage this technology to keep aerial drone service fees from skyrocketing.
* No flying at night (+- :30 sunset, sunrise)
* Maximum Altitude of 400'
* Operator must have visual line of sight of the aircraft at all times (no FPV without a spotter)
* No flying over people without their consent, or overhead protection
* Manned Aircraft always have the right of way regardless of what their doing
* No flying near forest fires
* No flying within 5 miles of an airport without clearance from the aircraft control tower or operator
* No flying over 100MPH
* No reckless flying that could injure people or damage property
* No flying over private property without permission from the owner (Florida Law)
* No flying under the influence of drugs and alcohol.
We recommend downloading the free FAA B4UFLY Smartphone App
If you are an RC hobbyist or professional, please note that safety and respect are key to your continued enjoyment/profit, and your right to fly is secondary to federal and state laws. We strongly recommend practicing in an open public or lawful private large open area to get comfortable with your aircraft's controls prior to flying around obstacles, people, or low flying aircraft such as helicopters. Additionally, please note that most drone apps log your flight locations and you will probably get caught if you're flying dangerously.
Please remember that most off the shelf drones systems, while generally reliable, do not meet the same aircraft safety standards/testing as a manned aircraft. Furthermore, most drones are not weather resistant and components can fail from environmental conditions, causing the drone to fall, so never assume that your drone will not fall on people, or that you will be able to move it from the known flight path of a manned aircraft in an emergency when it disconnects.
If you are an unwilling participant (drone hovering over your head), victim of voyeurism, or witness a drone flying at night, you should attempt to locate the operator and voice your concerns, and when this fails, get video or photos of the aircraft, then contact local law enforcement, or the FAA directly. Additionally, please note that most drone operators probably do not even realize that they are doing anything wrong, as the operator in the story linked above was only 15.
In recent months, I have noticed a surge of realtors questioning the necessity of our Florida Law compliant inspection process and reports. The key complaint is that other inspectors reports are much shorter and less comprehensive than ours, inferring that they do not want their clients receiving any "unnecessary"information, which could "kill the deal". However, when questioned most Realtors have never reviewed the Florida Statutes governing Home Inspectors and are not aware of the strict minimum standards enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2013, and when the new statues came out, we painstakingly changed our 400 point process to ensure compliance for our customers and Realtors that rely on our advice.
This is a common problem in the industry when realtors have not been formally educated on the Florida Statutes regarding home Inspection, and home inspectors, who are sometimes unlicensed, convince realtors (sometimes innocently) that their inspection process and reports are compliant, negatively referring to compliant inspectors as "cowboys" and "deal killers".
A common motivation for this behavior is inspectors seeking to maximise revenues, by shortening their process, thus enabling them to perform more inspections, with less legal exposure, which is why I will not perform more the two single family home inspections a day. However, many of the inspectors, which are being demonized by the non-compliant inspectors are actually just performing their due diligence in accordance with Florida Law, and unfortunately, a proportion of realtors tend to take the easy wrong over the hard (ethical) right as not to risk their commission.
However, it is fairly easy to determine the difference between a rookie inspector overkill and a thorough inspection by a experienced inspector, as the real material defects listed by the inspector will have a measurable standard to compare them against, such as Florida Building Code/IRC standards, and if they do, it is obvious that the inspector is just doing a better job. Many inspectors will downplay their lack of due diligence (errors and omissions), and lacking reports, by stating that the "minor"defects do not matter, but its either a defect or it isn't, and it's very irresponsible (at best) for an inspector to intentionally omit any tangible material defect.
With well over 1K inspections under my belt since the new statutes, and an average of 500 per year for the foreseeable future, I have concluded that in most cases inspectors have simply not kept up with the drastic changes to the Florida Statutes (2010-2013) regarding home inspections, and the Real Estate industry does not require a formal education in the statutes regarding home inspection, but alternatively teach a proprietary NAR/FAR inspection standard that does not parallel Florida Law.
Why should I care?
While a realtor is not technically responsible for their home inspectors lack of due diligence, I can assure you that you will feel the aftermath when a vendor on your referral list makes a major error or omision.
What is a Home Inspection and who can perform one?
First, only a licensed Florida Home Inspector may perform a fee paid "Home Inspection" for a Real Estate sale transaction or any other similar situation, and yes, a General Contractor, Engineer, or Architect must also hold a Home Inspection License to perform a fee paid home inspection. Additionally, a fee paid home inspection requires that the inspection process covers all 8 major systems of the home and the 4-point insurance inspection is not a Home Inspection as defined by Florida law.
A home inspection as defined by the 2013 Florida Statute is:
468.8311 Definitions.--As used in this part, the term:
(1) “Home inspection services” means a limited visual examination of the following readily accessible installed systems and components of a home: the structure, electrical system, HVAC system, roof covering, plumbing system, interior components, exterior components, and site conditions that affect the structure, for the purposes of providing a written professional opinion of the condition of the home.
Home inspectors must also provide customers with their licensure information, as well as the scope of their inspection, along with any limitations/exclusions of their inspection process. We and several other firms require a signed contract prior to performing the inspection as evidence that the customer has received all information required by florida law. However, this is sometimes a contentious issue when realtors are unaware of this requirement due to their usual inspectors non-compliance
468.8321 Disclosures.--Prior to contracting for or commencing a home inspection, a home inspector shall provide to the consumer a copy of his or her license to practice home inspection services in this state and a written disclosure that contains the scope and any exclusions of the home inspection.
History.—s. 2, ch. 2007-235.
The Home inspection report:
There are a few basic types of reports, which are the checklist, narrative, or combination thereof. Regardless of the type of report, all eight of the homes major systems must covered. Key omissions that I have observed from many inspectors are failure to provide a written report, evaluating the "why" part of the material defect, reporting systems that are at or nearing the end of their useful life. However, the most common point of contention from Realtors is the failure of the inspector to evaluate or place defects into perspective, and unfortunately, there is no requirement for a Home Inspector to have previous building trades experience, and many are unable to evaluate most defects, which ends with the homeowner having to hire another tradesman for "further evaluation". While no inspector is perfect, or has all of the answers, they should certainly be able to determine if you need to replace a light bulb, instead of referring them to an electrician for further evaluation, or whether the hairline cracks in a 1940's home is from typical settlement, instead of referring them to a structural engineer.
468.8323 Home inspection report.--Upon completion of each home inspection for compensation, the home inspector shall provide a written report prepared for the client.
(1) The home inspector shall report:
(a) On those systems and components inspected that, in the professional opinion of the inspector, are significantly deficient or are near the end of their service lives.
(b) If not self-evident, a reason why the system or component reported under paragraph (a) is significantly deficient or near the end of its service life.
(c) Any systems and components that were present at the time of the inspection but were not inspected, and a reason they were not inspected.
(2) A home inspector is not required to provide estimates related to the cost of repair of an inspected property.
History.--s. 2, ch. 2007-235; s. 9, ch. 2011-222.
Here is the part that I have seen the most egregious violations. For instance, I have seen a home inspector, who is also a general contractor/mold remediator. who has identified mold problems during inspections, then quotes a remediation from their construction company, which is a violation of Florida law. Additionally, any form of Quid Pro Quo with Real Estate brokerages or Realtors is strictly prohibited.
468.8319 Prohibitions; penalties.--
(1) A person may not:
(a) Effective July 1, 2011, practice or offer to practice home inspection services unless the person has complied with the provisions of this part.
(b) Effective July 1, 2011, use the name or title “certified home inspector,” “registered home inspector,” “licensed home inspector,” “home inspector,” “professional home inspector,” or any combination thereof unless the person has complied with the provisions of this part.
(c) Present as his or her own the license of another.
(d) Knowingly give false or forged evidence to the department or an employee thereof.
(e) Use or attempt to use a license that has been suspended or revoked.
(f) Perform or offer to perform any repairs to a home on which the inspector or the inspector’s company has prepared a home inspection report. This paragraph does not apply to a home warranty company that is affiliated with or retains a home inspector to perform repairs pursuant to a claim made under a home warranty contract.
(g) Inspect any property in which the inspector or the inspector’s company has any financial or transfer interest.
(h) Offer or deliver any compensation, inducement, or reward to any broker or agent therefor for the referral of the owner of the inspected property to the inspector or the inspection company.
(i) Accept an engagement to make an omission or prepare a report in which the inspection itself, or the fee payable for the inspection, is contingent upon either the conclusions in the report, pre established findings, or the close of escrow.
(2) Any person who is found to be in violation of any provision of this section commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.--s. 2, ch. 2007-235; s. 20, ch. 2010-106; s. 12, ch. 2010-176; s. 8, ch. 2011-222.
I was recently hired by a contractor from way out of town to inspect their family members new construction home (s) in Vernon Florida. If you are not from this area you must first understand that Washington County, Fl only has one building code inspector and his name is Mike Gordon. The main complaint was that there were moisture intrusion problems that the clients had noticed early on in the construction process that the contractor RANDY WILSON CONSTRUCTION INC blamed on a bad window and door, so the contractor took apart the brand new windows, applied sealant, thus degassing/ruining them, which most likely violated the manufacturers warranty.
I was very nice when I said moisture intrusion problems, when what was actually going on was a "free flow" of water from the 2nd floor that runs down the wall of the first floor. This condition was witnessed and documented by me, but also captured unitentionally by the homeowners historical documentation, which clearly shows that the contractor failed to complete the exterior building envelope.
Once arriving on the property, I was greeted by the Contractors employee, who told me that I had 5 minutes to get out of the home before the contractor arrived, so after telling the contractors monkey to go away, I called the homeowner to meet us at the property. However the homeowner did not make it there prior to the contractor, and I was quickly surrounded by his boys, and therefore he felt empowered to explain to me that I wasn't from that area, and regardless of who owned the property that I was to answer to him. Needless to say there was a bit of body language and vocal inflections used by the contractor that I felt were inappropriate, so I told him to tone it down a bit, and told him that the homeowner or police were the only folks opinion that I was concerned with.
Fortunately, my clients arrived and told the contractor that I was hired by them, and he said "let's go look at things", and I said " I would like some privacy with my clients" and he stated in a very bullying way to my clients that they did not have the right to speak with me alone on the property, so I told him to go away and he did.
Shortly after my departure, the contractor/bully told my clients that "This was his house until he was done at that nobody, including the owners could enter until he was done" and promptly locked them out.
My findings revealed a complete absence of an exterior envelope that would prevent water intrusion from wind driven rain, which will require significant drywall replacement, as well as insulation/mold remediation, and that he had also destroyed their brand new window and door.
I initially bid this job as a little over break even, as it was a 2 hour round trip, because I felt that there were people in need. Now that I have seen how bad this contractor has treated these nice people, I have given them the 1st trip for free and will come back out with my senior inspector at no additional charge. I could care less how much this costs me in the end, because these people are in need, and it is obvious that the municipality is not going to help them.
This is a good example why Home Inspections should become a required part of the Home Buying process.
If you were buying a home, would you allow the listing agent pick and order your appraiser for you? Fortunately, the appraisal is usually a mandatory part of the process when lenders are involved, and any meddling by a Realtor creates a serious conflict of interest, whether real or perceived. If you answered no to the first question then why would you allow the seller to pick the Home Inspector, as a home inspection can have just as much or more of an impact than the appraisal, as I have personally seen several transactions cancel after an inspection where the appraisal came in fine.
In full disclosure, our firm is on the referral lists of several Real Estate Brokerages, and I have personally been referred by listing agents that were acting on the behalf of both sides of the transaction. I also feel strongly that most of my peers that are on the same reference lists would never skew a report for a Realtor. I also feel that most Realtors would not ask a Home Inspector to manipulate the transaction. However, most is not 100%, and it does happen, so you should vet your inspector whether you found them on the internet or referral sheet from a Realtor.
Is your Home Inspector a "Home Inspector" and is your Home Inspection a "Home Inspection" as defined by Florida Statutes?
Is your Home Inspector a "Home Inspector" and did you just pay for a "Home Inspection" as defined by Florida Law?
What if general contractor was selling real-estate without a license, after all a general contractor has a lot of experience with real estate transactions. Think about the damage that could be done if a realtor was using non-compliant real estate contracts to make sure that the deal goes through instead of Florida contracts.
Unfortunately, this happens quite often in the home inspection industry and unlicensed inspectors, non-compliant inspections, or a combination there of cause financial hardship for consumers and professionals a like. The good news is that Florida has recently implemented some of the highest standards for Home Inspector licensing, and Home Inspection reports in the Country. Making the scenarios discussed above a crime.
Florida law requires that "Licensed" Home Inspectors provide the consumer with proof of their licensure along with a full disclosure of their Standards of Practice, including all limitations and exclusions of their inspection prior to performing the inspection. It is not the consumers responsibility to ask the home inspector for this information. Contact the Florida Department of Business Professional Regulation if you feel that you have received a non-compliant inspection or have been referred to or solicited by an unlicensed inspector.
1940 North Monroe Street, Tallahassee FL 32399 :Customer Contact Center: 850.487.1395
Here is a link to our updated standards of practice, limitations/exclusions, inspector credentials, and a courtesy link into the Florida Statutes and Administrative Code for Home Inspectors.